By
Adam Simmons
· Last checked
August 2026
The most useful correction to make early: the clinical record is not a folder or a file type. It is a category of information, and things fall into it by what they are, not by where they happen to be stored. Ontario's health privacy statute defines a record as "a record of information in any form or in any medium, whether in written, printed, photographic or electronic form or otherwise" (PHIPA, s. 2). Medium is explicitly not the test.
So the working question is not "is this in my chart software?" It is "is this information I created or received about this client in the course of the professional relationship?" If yes, it is very likely part of the record whether it currently lives in your notes, your inbox, your phone, or a scrap of paper.
Each College publishes its own content list. They overlap heavily but they are not identical, and yours is the one that governs.
The most useful correction to make early: the clinical record is not a folder or a file type. It is a category of information, and things fall into it by what they are, not by where they happen to be stored. Ontario's health privacy statute defines a record as "a record of information in any form or in any medium, whether in written, printed, photographic or electronic form or otherwise" (PHIPA, s. 2). Medium is explicitly not the test.
So the working question is not "is this in my chart software?" It is "is this information I created or received about this client in the course of the professional relationship?" If yes, it is very likely part of the record whether it currently lives in your notes, your inbox, your phone, or a scrap of paper.
Each College publishes its own content list. They overlap heavily but they are not identical, and yours is the one that governs.
What does your College say has to be in it?
For registered psychotherapists, Standard 5.1 opens flatly: "Registrants keep an accurate, complete, and legible clinical record for each client." The standard then lists what the record includes — client profile, assessment, plan for therapy, progress notes, work product, consultations and referrals, reports, incident reports, mandatory reports, and a closing record (CRPO Standard 5.1).
One row of that list answers a question practitioners ask constantly. Under Client contact, the record holds "A notation of all in-session and out-of-session contacts with a client or their authorized representative", and the examples given are "letters, emails, texts, and telephone calls." Copies of written communications are named too.
For social workers and social service workers, the third-edition Standards of Practice say records "shall include progress notes and reports and, depending on whether the practice context is direct/clinical or indirect/non-clinical, may include any or all of the following: checklists; correspondence; minutes; client reflections, journals, art, and/or homework (direct/clinical settings); appointment records; and/or audio and/or video recordings" (OCSWSSW, Principle IV, 4.1.2).
For psychologists and psychological associates, the College of Psychologists and Behaviour Analysts of Ontario — the renamed College of Psychologists, which since 2024 also regulates behaviour analysts — opens with a duty and then a list: "Registrants must keep a record regarding the services they provide to each client. Each record must contain: a. Identifying information about the client, including name, date of birth, address and (if available) telephone number and email address of each service recipient; b. Dates and details of every relevant or material service contact or consultation; c. A description of any presenting problem and of any history relevant to the problem" (CPBAO Standard 9.2).
Clause (b) is the one that reaches a phone call or a message, and it carries its own filter: relevant or material. Not every contact — every contact that mattered.
What about the material that does not feel like "the record"?
This is where most of the real uncertainty sits — rough notes, a text about moving an appointment, a voicemail, a scribbled thought after a hard session.
The social work standards address it directly. "The tools or data used by the College registrant in developing a professional opinion may be included in the record. Such tools or data may include rough or draft notes, messages, test results, sociograms and/or genograms. If placed in the record, these tools cannot be removed and shall be managed in the same way as other documents in the record, in accordance with privacy legislation; if not placed in the record, they shall be appropriately destroyed" (OCSWSSW 4.1.2).
Read that twice, because it contains a decision rather than a default. You choose whether the draft note goes in. What you may not do is keep it in a drawer as an unfiled shadow copy.
CRPO's Electronic Practice Guideline makes a related point about electronic material, and it is a sharper one than most practitioners expect: "clients may be interested to know whether email communications are stored separately or in the clinical record, or whether sessions can be recorded. Consider these matters carefully, as emails and recordings effectively serve as transcripts of the therapy" (CRPO Electronic Practice Guideline).
Does it matter where it physically lives?
Not for whether it is a record. It matters a great deal for whether you can meet the obligations attached to being a record — retrieval, correction, secure storage, transfer, and secure destruction at the end of the retention period.
Splitting a record across places is expressly allowed, at least in Ontario psychology, and the permission comes with the condition that makes it workable: "Different components of a record can be stored across multiple locations. If so, each location must reference the other locations" (CPBAO Standard 9.4(c)). Messages in one system and notes in another is a legitimate arrangement. Messages in one system that the notes never mention is not.
That is the practical reason practitioners consolidate. A record scattered across a phone, two email accounts and a chart system is still one record legally, and one of those places will be the one you cannot produce from when someone asks.
What is the honest grey area?
Two things come up repeatedly and neither has a tidy answer.
Your own process notes. Whether a separate set of personal reflections sits outside the record is a question people argue about, and the answer depends on your College's wording, on what the notes actually contain, and on whether a court would see them as part of the file regardless of what you called them.
Anything a client sends unprompted. A late-night email, a photo, a link. Once you have received it, the question of whether it is "in" the record is no longer really about your filing preferences.
Both of these are worth one call to your College's practice advisory service rather than one confident paragraph from anybody else. Practice advisors answer this specific question routinely and the call is free.
The short version
The record is defined by content and relationship, not by medium or location. Your College publishes a list. Read the actual list rather than a summary of it, including yours — the lists differ, and the differences are exactly where people get caught.
About Rivet
Rivet is a Canadian practice line built for therapists — a separate number for calls, texts and voicemail, with video sessions and clinical tools in the same place. Your data stays in Canada, and transcription runs on Rivet's own hardware rather than a third-party AI service.
One plan, $65 CAD a month, everything included. Fourteen-day trial, no card.